Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 379 So. 2d 27 - Launey v. Thomas

379 So. 2d 27 - Launey v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2011

21 state decisions

1601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 341 So. 2d 332 - Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. · 373 So. 2d 498 - Reck v. Stevens · Campbell v. American Home Assurance Company · Sonnier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company · 188 So. 2d 111 - Broussard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"LSA-R.S. 22:1406(D)(6) provides for the admissibility of sworn notarized affidavits as prima facie proof of uninsured status. No affidavits were offered in evidence in this case, but the statute does not mean that affidavits are the exclusive methods of proof. Absent such affidavits, plaintiffs may sustain their burden of proving the offending driver is uninsured by other evidence. We find no error in the trial judge's acceptance of the sworn and uncontradicted testimony of the owner-driver as proof there was no insurance on his car." (citations omitted) Similarly, in the present matter the only testimony concerning uninsured status was that of the owner and the driver of the car. Thus, we hold that under Launey this testimony was sufficient proof of the uninsured status of David W. Clark.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.