Weinstein v. Heyman

Decided February 5, 1980

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-02-05

Relies on 126 So. 2d 578 - Belden v. Lynch · 336 So. 2d 467 - Ranger v. AVIS RENT-A-CAR SYS. INC. · 364 So. 2d 90 - Balart v. Michel's Kartway, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-02-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably 527 So. 2d 209 - State v. Brown (1988), 421 So. 2d 562 - SUMMIT CHASE COND. ASSOC., INC. v. Protean Investors, Inc. (1982)

27 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Subsequent to the opinions found in Heyman v. Weinstein, 333 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Heyman v. WEKA, Inc., 333 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); the matter .returned to the trial court and the appellee made an election to secure a judgment solely against Katz, Weinstein, and KAWE, Inc., d/b/a Regent Drugs.

¶2This appeal then ensued and the appellants now urge error in the original trial proceedings in denying the defendant’s motions for directed verdict. We have examined the original trial record in this connection and find no error. Therefore, the final judgment here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed. Belden v. Lynch, 126 So.2d 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); Ranger v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc., 336 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Balart v. Michel’s Kartway, Inc., 364 So.2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

¶3Affirmed.