Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

379 So. 2d 769

Vanacor v. Amant

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1979

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1979-11-27

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1984

2 state decisions

Relies on Superdome Services, Inc. v. State · Foster v. Hampton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-11-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

¶2Notwithstanding Foster v. Hampton, La.1977, 352 So.2d 197, and Foster v. Hampton, La.1980, 381 So.2d 789, ruling that the State is the employer of a deputy sheriff, the State has provided by law for deputy sheriffs to be paid their salaries by the respective sheriffs for whom they are deputies. It is the sheriff’s obligation to pay to the deputies that he appoints their salaries, and the sheriff is in that sense the “employer” who is obliged by La.R.S. 23:631 to pay those salaries promptly upon termination of employment and is subject to the penalty and attorney fee provisions of the statute for his breach of that obligation.

¶3Rehearing refused.

/379/so2d/769 · .json · Public domain