Ingram v. Ingram’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
January 1993
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 334 So. 2d 13 - Shaw v. Shaw · 335 So. 2d 5 - Shannon v. State · 379 So. 2d 949 - Duncan v. Duncan · Ingram v. Ingram
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The determination of the trial judge that there was no "special equity," as we have defined it ... was proper... . This does not mean that the trial judge was without the discretionary authority to make an alimony award to the husband if such an award was necessary to do equity between the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.