Wilhelm E. Shissler, for appellants.
James W. Evans, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
¶1
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a federal question · Case Law">substantial federal question.
379 U.S. 20
Docket No. 353.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 26, 1964
Supreme Court of the United States · decided October 26, 1964
Cited by 2 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1993
1 state decisions
Relies on Giova v. Rosenberg · Tancil v. Woolls
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided October 26, 1964
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
Wilhelm E. Shissler, for appellants.
James W. Evans, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a federal question · Case Law">substantial federal question.