Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 ALA 279 - Lawson v. Hicks

Lawson v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

1862

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2010 · most notably Briscoe v. W (1983), Berry v. City of New York Ins. Co. (1923)

1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions — followed in 11 states

601862187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blakey's Heirs v. Blakey's · Hastings v. Lusk · Ewing v. Sanford · Long v. Rodgers · Ring v. Wheeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Comprehends all those cases,’ where the author of the alleged mischief acted in the discharge of any public or private duty, whether legal or moral, which the ordinary exigencies of society, or his own private interest, or even that of another, called upon him to perform.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When they are [qualifiedly] privileged, the law simply withdraws the legal inference of malice, and gives a protection upon the condition, that actual malice, or express malice, or malice in fact, (as the same idea is variously phrased,) is not shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.