Conley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1995
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. State · Walker v. State · Scruggs v. State · 29 Ala. App. 225 - Chaney v. State · Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““16. I charge you, gentlemen of the jury, that if the deceased made a sudden, unprovoked, murderous attack upon defendant, the deceased at the time being armed with a deadly weapon, and, in the act' of effectuating upon the defendant his murderous purpose, and after considering all the evidence in the case you find this to be true, then I charge you that the defendant was under no duty to retreat, but had the right to stand his ground and to kill his assailant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Abernathy v. State““The rule that a person need not retreat or seek to escape, even though he can do so without increasing his peril, but may lawfully resist even to the extent of taking life if necessary, where he is assaulted in his own dwelling house or within the curtilage thereof, ‘is predicated on the absence of aggression or fault on his part in bringing on the difficulty.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cannon““These and similar charges have been held to assert correct propositions of law in the character of cases cited by ■appellant, however, in different factual situations their refusal has been held proper. Scruggs v. State, 224 Ala. 328 , 140 So. 405 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Abernathy v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.