Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 Ala. App. 642 - State v. Homan

38 Ala. App. 642 - State v. Homan’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 1990
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 1990

9 state decisions

6019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Winters v. People of State of New York · United States v. Petrillo · Yeilding v. State Ex Rel. Wilkinson · Parisian Co. v. Williams · State v. Goldstein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A town is a municipal corporation with limited territory and powers. It exists only under and within its charter, viz., statutes. Its subsidiary legislation and other assertions of authority are entirely dependent upon statutory predicates. In Alabama there is no general, inherent right of local self government, Yeilding v. State, 232 Ala. 292 , 167 So. 580 . And (unlike the rules in respect of private corporations and the Federal Government) in construing the grant of a power the rule of strict construction applies so that if there is reasonable doubt concerning the existence of the power the doubt should be resolved against the asserted power. Dillon, Municipal Corporations 2d Ed., Vol. 1, Section 55. Posey v. Town of North Birmingham, 154 Ala. 511 , 45 So. 663 , 15 L.R.A.,N.S., 711, where operation of municipal light plant was held ultra vires. Colvin v. Ward, 189 Ala. 198 , 66 So. 98 .” State v. Homan, 38 Ala.App. 642, 646 , 92 So.2d 51, 54 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.