Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 ALAAPP 667 - Bishop v. State

Bishop v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
February 1980
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1980

10 state decisions

401957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 33 Ala. App. 328 - Scott v. State · 28 Ala. App. 587 - State of Tennessee v. Hamilton · 30 Ala. App. 412 - Hobbs v. Tennessee Ex Rel. State · LaRault v. Palmer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court having ruled in positive fashion that it would not admit any evidence tending to show that the extradition was sought in aid of the collection of a debt, an actual offer of evidence upon this issue was unnecessary to preserve the question for appellate review. See 3 Am.Jur., App. & Error, Sec. 354; La Rault v. Palmer, 51 Wash. 664 , 99 P. 1036 , 21 L.R.A.,N.S., 354.” Bishop v. State, 38 Ala.App. 667, 669 , 92 So.2d 323, 325 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Killingsworth v. Killingsworth
  2. ““By its rulings the court below precluded this appellant from attempting a showing which, if established to the required degree, would have entitled him to his discharge. His efforts along this line may, or may not, have been meritorious. He at least however was entitled to an attempt to show that the extradition proceedings were in aid of collecting a debt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Busey v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.