Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 ARKAPP 102 - Jernigan v. State

Jernigan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Missouri v. Hunter · Russell v. State · McDaniel v. State · Razorback Cab of Fort Smith, Inc. v. Lingo · Finn v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The distinction between that case and this one is that in Lingo the plaintiff himself sought to introduce his own complaint as substantive evidence. In the case at bar, the defendant sought to impeach the prosecuting witness with the latter’s complaint filed in a civil action. Under these circumstances the complaint qualifies as a prior inconsistent statement under Ark. R. Evid. 613. See McDaniel v. State, 291 Ark. 596 , 726 S.W.2d 679 (1987).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Any person who is found guilty of or pleads guilty to a felony involving the use of a deadly weapon, whether or not an element of the crime, shall be sentenced to serve a minimum of ten (10) years in the state prison without parole but subject to reduction by meritorious good-time credit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.