In Re Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2010
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Doan v. Hudgins · Redmond v. Tuttle · Credithrift of America, Inc. v. Dubrock (In Re Dubrock) · Yoder v. United States (In Re Yoder) · Andermahr v. Barrus (In Re Andermahr)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he failure to claim the exemption in the original documents is almost always the result of “attorney oversight” or “miscommunication” between the attorney and client not intentional misconduct or gross neglect.... The trustee and affected creditors can be protected from prejudice and fraud by requiring reimbursement of costs and expenses reasonably incurred in detrimental reliance on the original exemption schedule on a case by case basis. (Footnote excluded).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Blaise
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.