Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 CAL 287 - Doll v. Good

Doll v. Good’s Empirical Analysis

1869

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
6
states following
June 1966
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 1966

21 state decisions

5018691870188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Richmond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rules of pleading are intended to prevent evasion and to require a denial of every specific allegation in a sworn complaint in substance and in spirit, and not merely a denial of its literal truth.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.