Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 CAL2D 230 - In Re Ochse

In Re Ochse’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 1997 · most notably 51 Cal. 2d 777 - People v. Mattson (1959), In Re Newbern (1960)

4 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

20019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court · 27 Cal. 2d 7 - People v. Sarazzawski · 50 Cal. App. 797 - In Re Rider · In Re McCoy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A fundamental part of the constitutional right of an accused to be represented by counsel is that his attorney must be afforded reasonable opportunity to prepare for trial. ... To make such right effective, counsel is obviously entitled to the aid of such expert assistance as he may need ... in preparing the defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Adequate legal representation, of course, requires a full disclosure of the facts to counsel, and in order to assure that a client may safely reveal all the facts of his case to his attorney, the law has long recognized the need for secrecy with respect to communications between them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.