Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 CAL2D 302 - In Re James

In Re James’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

226
cited by 226 later decisions
5
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 197 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 226 later decisions — most recently September 2008 · most notably 58 Cal. 2d 601 - Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd. (1962), 60 Cal. 2d 139 - People v. Wilson (1963)

19 federal appellate · 197 state decisions

1160195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Williams v. Kaiser · Bute v. People of State of Illinois · Uveges v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania · Gibbs v. Burke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 226 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[T]he court cannot accept a waiver of counsel from anyone accused of a serious public offense without first determining that he”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““If the defendant appears for arraignment without counsel, he must be informed by the court that it is his right to have counsel before being arraigned, and must be asked if he desires the aid of counsel. If he desires and is unable to employ counsel, the court must assign counsel to defend him. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “his confinement based upon the invalid 1944 judgment, together with any time credits for good conduct earned thereon (Pen.Code, § 2920), would be credited upon the new sentence for the same criminal act. (Pen.Code, § 2900.1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.