38 Cal. 2d 419 - Tuttle v. Tuttle’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 1987 · most notably 42 Cal. 2d 55 - Flynn v. Flynn (1954), 42 Cal. 2d 36 - Dexter v. Dexter (1954)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 26 Cal. 2d 605 - Hough v. Hough · 21 Cal. 2d 145 - Leupe v. Leupe · Puckett v. Puckett · Sears Ettlinger v. Ettlinger · 4 Cal. 2d 227 - Dupont v. Dupont
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is ample evidence to support the trial court’s findings in the order denying modification that the provision for payments to Lillie was a disposition of property rights and not alimony. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lipka v. Lipka
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.