38 Cal. 3d 337 - Trousil v. State Bar’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
72 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 4 Cal. 3d 786 - Himmel v. State Bar · 36 Cal. 3d 116 - Chefsky v. State Bar · 37 Cal. 3d 122 - Tarver v. State Bar · 36 Cal. 3d 785 - Palomo v. State Bar · 24 Cal. 3d 153 - Baranowski v. State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`In meeting this burden, the petitioner must demonstrate that the charges of unprofessional conduct are not sustained by convincing proof and to a reasonable certainty. [Citation.]'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“( Vaughn v. State Bar (1972) 6 Cal.3d 847, 852 [ 100 Cal. Rptr. 713 , 494 P.2d 1257 ]; Chefsky v. State Bar (1984) 36 Cal.3d 116, 121 [ 202 Cal. Rptr. 349 , 680 P.2d 82 ].) Moreover, petitioner bears the burden of showing that the findings of the State Bar are not supported by the evidence. ( Trousil v. State Bar (1985) 38 Cal.3d 337, 341 [ 211 Cal. Rptr. 525 , 695 P.2d 1066 ].)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.