Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 Cal. 3d 454 - Becker v. IRM Corp.

38 Cal. 3d 454 - Becker v. IRM Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

184
cited by 184 later decisions
12
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 165 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 184 later decisions — most recently February 2009 · most notably Shump v. First Continental-Robinwood Associates (1994), Considine v. City of Waterbury (2006)

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 165 state decisions — followed in 12 states

960198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rowland v. Christian · Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. · 20 Cal. 3d 413 - Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. · Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. · 27 Cal. 3d 741 - Thompson v. County of Alameda

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 184 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the degree of certainty that the plaintiff suffered injury, the closeness of the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the injury suffered, the moral blame attached to the defendant’s conduct, the policy of preventing future harm, the extent of the burden to the defendant and consequences to the community of imposing a duty to exercise care with resulting liability for breach, and the availability, cost, and prevalence of insurance for the risk involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.