¶1This is the independent suit to which reference is made in the opinion filed this day in case No. 1892 (ante, p. 750, [177 Pac. 510]). As stated therein the two cases are similar, and they are controlled by the same principles. For the reasons stated in said opinion the judgment herein is affirmed.
¶2A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on December 23, 1918.