Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 CALAPP2D 615 - Watts v. Currie

Watts v. Currie’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2019

6 state decisions

2019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haddad v. McDowell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if a plaintiff seeks to fasten a liability upon a defendant through the medium of a particular statute, he must allege sufficient facts in his complaint to bring the defendant within the scope of the statute; and ... until he does so[,] the defendant is not called upon to plead facts to take him out of the operation of the statute”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.