Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 CONNAPP 360 - Doe v. Marselle

Doe v. Marselle’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

232
cited by 232 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

232 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 232 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Doe v. Marselle (1996), Zirinsky v. Zirinsky (2005)

232 state decisions

1290199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Liljedahl Bros. v. Grigsby · Dubay v. Irish · Sanzone v. Board of Police Commissioners · Lees v. Middlesex Insurance · Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 232 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A `speaking' motion to strike (one imparting facts outside the pleadings) will not be granted.”
    72 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Ocasio-Maldonado v. City of Hartford, No. Cv 970567019 (Apr. 24, 1997) · Eastern Acct. Sys. v. So. New Eng. Tel., No. Cv98-033 27 58 S (May 7, 2001)
  2. “highly unreasonable conduct, involving an extreme departure from ordinary care, in a situation where a high degree of danger is apparent.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Wiggins v. Melendez, No. Lpl-Cv-98-0408648s (Dec. 9, 1998) · 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 3282 - Balzac v. Stamford Hospital, No. Cv95 0143645 S (Apr. 2, 1996)
  3. “When the allegations of an amended complaint appear to be the same in substance as those of an earlier complaint that was stricken the defendant may challenge the amended complaint by filing . . . a second motion to strike.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Broadnax v. City of New Haven, No. Cv 98-0412193 S (Dec. 5, 2000) · McHenry v. Lubell, No. Cv 034 68 42 S (Aug. 2, 2001)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.