Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 CONNAPP 588 - State v. Nazario

State v. Nazario’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Gray v. Lucas, Warden, Et Al. · United States v. Angulo-Lopez · State v. Barton · State v. Duntz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The nexus between the items sought and the place to be searched may be inferred from the type of crime, the nature of the evidence, the extent of an opportunity for concealment and normal inferences as to where a criminal would likely hide the item . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Actual observances of illegal activity or contraband in the premises to be searched . . . are not required to establish probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there is a CT Page 14002 fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.