38 Conn. Super. Ct. 509 - Lamalfa v. Higgins’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “plaintiff may amend his complaint as of right during the first thirty days after the return day. General Statutes § 52-128 ; Practice Book § 175. He may further amend the complaint at any time before the case is submitted to the jury by order of the court”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Elhage v. King Conn. Enterprises, No. 320137 (Apr. 26, 1996) · Elhage v. King Conn. Enterprises, No. 32 01 37 (Apr. 26, 1996)

2. “[a]ttorney's fees may properly be awarded in actions for fraud.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sun Bin Song v. Lee, No. Cv 98 0168714 S (Aug. 27, 1999) · 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 1318 - Riiska v. Bendell, No. Cv97 0074843 (Jan. 21, 1998)

3. “plaintiff may amend his complaint as of right during the first thirty days after the return day. General Statutes § 52-128 ; Practice Book § 175. He may further amend the complaint at any time before the case is submitted to the jury by CT Page 4128 order of the court”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 4126 - Valentino v. Miller, No. 31 59 28 (May 6, 1996)