Jarboe v. Templer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The parties to the original bill were citizens of different states, and the jurisdiction of the court completely attached to the controversy. Having so attached, it could not be devested by any subsequent events, and the court had a rightful authority to proceed to a final determination of it. If, after the commencement of the suit, the original plaintiff had removed into, and become a citizen of, Ehode Island, the jurisdiction over the cause would not have been devested by such change of domicile;” citing Morgan’s Heirs v. Morgan, 2 Wheat. 290 ; Molían v. Torrence, 9 Wheat. 537 ; and Dunn v. Clarke, 8 Pet. 1 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Cross v. Evans

2. ““It a change of domicile, making both parties citizens of the same state, would not devest jurisdiction, it is useless to argue that a transfer of the subject of litigation, producing the same result, would affect the jurisdiction.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Cross v. Evans