Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 F.1d 237 - Covert v. Sargent

Covert v. Sargent’s Empirical Analysis

38 F. 237 · 1889

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
February 1942
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1942

3 federal appellate ·

201889189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The patented articles are not so superior to' the other fastening devices as to give rise to any cqgent presumption that those-who purchased them of the defendants would have bought them of the plaintiff in preference to the other devices, and without reference to the difference in price, if they could not have bought them elsewhere.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “improvement in clasps or thimbles for hitching devices,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.