¶1*635J. Q. A. Harrod and Laynie W. Harrod, both of Oklahoma City, OH., for appellant.
¶2Roy St. Lewis, U. S. Atty., Herbert K. Hyde and William Earl Wiles, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of OHahoma City, Okl.
¶3Before LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and McDERMOTT, Circuit Judges.
¶5G. W. Oldham was convicted and sentenced upon three counts of an information charging violations of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA) and has appealed.
¶6Insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of guilty is the sole error assigned. We cannot consider this assignment because there is no proper bill of exceptions. Instead, there is a literal transcript of all the proceedings at the trial. Tingley v. United States (C. C. A. 16) 34 F.(2d) 1; Caldwell v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 36 F.(2d) 738; Davis v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 38 F.(2d) 631.
¶7The judgment is affirmed, and the mandate will issue forthwith.