Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

38 F.2d 944

Docket No. 4825.

McCarl v. Emerson

District of Columbia District Court

Argued Jan. 10, 1930.

Decided March 3, 1930.

Rehearing and Stay of Mandate Denied March 15, 1930.

District of Columbia District Court · decided 1930-03-03

2 counsel of record

Relies on McCarl v. Loud

Decided 1930-03-03

¶1Leo A. Rover and H. O. Hoagland, both of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

¶2S. T. Ansell and E. S. Bailey, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

¶3Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDÉL, Associate Justices.

¶4ROBB, Associate Justice.

¶5The facts in this case do not differ materially from those in the ease just decided, McCarl v. Loud, 59 App. D. C. 238, 38 F.(2d) 943. For reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the decree in this also is affirmed.

¶6Affirmed.

/38/f2d/944 · .json · Public domain