¶1Leo A. Rover and H. O. Hoagland, both of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
¶2S. T. Ansell and E. S. Bailey, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
¶3Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ÓRSDEL, Associate Justices.
¶5The facts in this case are substantially the same as in the ease just decided, McCarl v. Loud, 59 App. D. C. 238, 38 F.(2d) 943. For reasons stated in the opinion in that ease, the decree in this is also affirmed.
¶6Affirmed.