Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

38 F.3d 1213

Docket No. 93-6975.

Vincent Springs v. Edward W. Murray

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: January 11, 1994 Decided: October 14, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-10-14

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on United States v. Richard Hanley

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-10-14

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-92-373-R)

Vincent Springs, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.* Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Springs v. Murray, No. CA-92-373-R (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

The action was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties' consent. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)(1) (1988)

/38/f3d/1213 · .json · Public domain