Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

38 F.3d 1213

Docket No. 94-6815.

Tucker v. Miller

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted August 25, 1994. Decided October 13, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-10-13

Relies on United States v. Richard Hanley

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-10-13

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-94-84-5-BR)

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying leave to file a complaint pursuant to a pre-filing injunction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Miller, No. CA-94-84-5-BR (E.D.N.C. July 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/38/f3d/1213 · .json · Public domain