Keller v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
38 F.3d 16 · 1994
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 14 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Palmacci v. Umpierrez (1997), Alexis v. McDonald's Restaurants of Massachusetts, Inc. (1995)
33 federal appellate · 14 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 33 U.S.C. § 903 · 33 U.S.C. § 904 · 33 U.S.C. § 905 · 33 U.S.C. § 941
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Barker v. Wingo · Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki · Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los Santos · Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a post-'turnover' duty may arise if the vessel owner was obligated, by contract, statute or custom, to monitor stevedoring operations for the purpose of detecting and remedying unsafe conditions”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“duties of care: 24 First, the vessel owner might remain under such a duty were it to retain actual physical control or custody of a portion of the vessel, or participate in stevedoring operations. Scindia, 451 U.S. at 167, 101 S.Ct. at 1622.... Second, a duty to intervene might attach in the event the vessel owner were to acquire actual knowledge that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“had developed in the vessel's appurtenances since turnover, that the stevedore-employer will not address the unsafe condition, and that the stevedore's decision not to remedy the developing hazard was”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.