United States v. Narvaez’s Empirical Analysis
38 F.3d 162 · 1994
Citation profile
23 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably United States v. Holmes (2005), United States v. Parker (1998)
23 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Granito v. United States · Mayers v. United States · Blasius v. United States · Steffens v. Derwinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is appellant’s responsibility to order parts of the record which he contends contain error and his failure to do so prevents us from reviewing this assignment of error. As the district court relied upon such evidence and as [appellant] failed to order that portion of the record, this court is precluded from reviewing his allegation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As the district court relied upon such evidence and as [defendant] failed to order that portion of the record, this court is precluded from reviewing his allegation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he district court may consider unidentified participants when there is proof that they were involved in the precise transaction underlying the conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.