Mark Inc v. Gruber’s Empirical Analysis
38 F.3d 369 · 1994
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Stromberg Metal Works, Inc. v. Press Mechanical, Inc. (1996), Smith v. Shawnee Library System (1995)
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on United States v. Teague · King v. Ionization International, Inc. · United States v. Martinez · Esmark, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Geras v. Lafayette Display Fixtures, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nless the latecomer, too, consents, the whole proceeding before the magistrate judge may be set at naught.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.