Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 F.3d 488 - Orhorhaghe v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Orhorhaghe v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis

38 F.3d 488 · 1994

Citation profile

113
cited by 113 later decisions
3
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 113 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Trulock v. Freeh (2001), United States v. Lattimore (1996)

50 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions

560199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1357 (§ 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · Rochin v. People of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “egregious violations ... transgress notions of fundamental fairness and undermine the probative value of the evidence obtained”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “at liberty to ignore the police presence and go about his business”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “considers whether the agents committed the violations deliberately or by conduct a reasonable officer should have known would violate the Constitution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.