Martinez v. Hoke’s Empirical Analysis
38 F.3d 655 · 1994
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2011
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · United Families of America v. Kendrick · Andrijevic v. Kelleran · Lambert v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If ... the motion to extend is not filed within subdivision (a)(5)'s grace period, the district court is without power to grant an extension.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.