Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 F.3d 842 - Bush v. Rauch

Bush v. Rauch’s Empirical Analysis

38 F.3d 842 · 1994

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
3
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Dickerson v. Mcclellan (1996), Sammye R. Holloway v. Sally Brush Clermont County, Ohio (2000)

36 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

4801994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Anderson v. Creighton · Kentucky v. Graham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Quasi-judicial immunity extends to those persons performing tasks so integral or intertwined with the judicial process that these persons are considered an arm of the judicial officer who is immune.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'the nature of the function performed, not the identity of the actor who performed it.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]s other circuits have held, [that] enforcing or executing a court order is intrinsically associated with a judicial proceeding.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.