Salazar v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Campos-Sanchez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Lee Moi Chong v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service · Carlos Castro-Cortez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Jose Luis Araujo · Ojeda-Terrazas v. Ashcroft · Pierrot Bejjani v. Immigration and Naturalization Service John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the Attorney General finds that an alien has reentered the United States illegally after having been removed or having departed voluntarily, under an order of removal, the prior order of removal is reinstated from its original date and is not subject to being reopened or reviewed, the alien is not eligible and may not apply for any relief under this chapter, and the alien shall be removed under the prior order at any time after the reentry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t is an open question whether the INS regulation providing for reinstatement of a prior removal order without a hearing could violate due process rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.