Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 Fla. 297 - Singleton v. State

Singleton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
November 2004
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2004 · most notably Page v. Watson (1938), 348 So. 2d 312 - Sullivan v. Askew (1977)

3 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

60189619001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Garland · People Ex Rel. Forsyth v. . Court of Sessions · Attorney General ex rel. Taylor v. Brown · Haley v. Clark · People v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... and it is not competent for the legislature to exercise such power.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The Governor, Secretary of State, Comptroller, Attorney General and Commissioner of Agriculture, or a major part of them, of whom the Governor shall be one, may, upon such conditions and with such limitations and restrictions as they may deem proper, remit fines and forfeitures, commute punishment, and grant pardon after conviction, in all cases except treason and impeachment, subject to such regulations as may be prescribed by law relative to the manner of applying for pardons.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““A pardon reaches both the punishment prescribed for the offense and the guilt of the offender; and when the pardon is full, .it releases the punishment and blots out of existence the guilt, so that in the eye of the law the offender is as innocent as if he had never committed the offense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.