Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 FSUPP3D 436 - Reich v. Lopez

Reich v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78D (§ 4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1965 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Papasan v. Allain · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Supreme Court's ... decision in Daimler AG v. Bauman has brought uncertainty to [the] application of New York's 'doing business' rule. As a result, it is unclear whether existing New York general jurisdiction jurisprudence remains viable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As long as enough domestic conduct exists to fulfill the requirements of ... wire fraud, it is irrelevant that those statutes are further violated by conduct that is extraterritorial in nature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “purposefully availed [it]self of the privilege of conducting activities within New York and thereby invoked the benefits and protections of its laws.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.