¶11. The evidence amply authorized the jury to find that the plaintiff in error and his codefendants entered into a conspiracy to commit the robbery charged. Under tuis ruling the admission of the evidence and the charge of the court complained of in the motion for a new trial were not error for any reason assigned.
¶22. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and impeaching, and is not of such a character as would probably produce a different verdict upon another trial.
¶33. The verdict was authorized by the evidence and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
¶4Judgment affirmed.