Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

38 How. Pr. 192

Smith v. Butler

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 15, 1864

New York Court of Common Pleas · decided 1864-12-15

In this case the plaintiffs charged Gen. Butler with seizing their banking-house, in New Orleans, and appropriating to his own use $60,000 in gold. They obtained an attachment against him, and the general’s counsel moved to remove the cause to the United States courts.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1883

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1864-12-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Carduzo, J.

¶1The twelfth section of the act of congress, passed September 24, 1789, provided that 11 if a suit be commenced in any state court against an alien, or by a citizen of the state in which the suit is brought, against a citizen of another state, it may, if it involve more than five hundred dollars, and certain things be done by the defendant, be removed to the United States court.”

¶2The present motion is based on that act, and as its provisions are seldom invoked, it is not surprising that they are but little understood and very generally misapprehended. The proofs before me establish that the plaintiffs are not citizens of this state. They are citizens of Louisiana, temporarily sojourning here. As, therefore, this suit is brought against a defendant who is a resident of another state, and is not prosecuted by a citizen of this state, the case is. not within the statute, either in form or in spirit. Probably the, object of the statute was to guard against the possibility or the suspicion of bias in the state court in favor of its own citizen against a non-resident, but no such bias could be presumed when the litigation was between non-residents.

¶3The motion must be denied, with ten dollars costs to the plaintiff, to abide the event of the action.

/38/howpr/192 · .json · Public domain