Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 ILLAPP2D 229 - Sphatt v. Tulley

Sphatt v. Tulley’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
August 1990
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 1990

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

1301962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “«# * contributory negligence on the part of a plaintiff is a matter of fact for the jury to determine unless the question has become one of law, in that all reasonable minds would reach the conclusion that there was contributory negligence. Bunton v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 15 IllApp2d 311, 146 NE2d 205 ; Thomas v. Buchanan, 357 Ill 270, 192 NE 215 ; Geraghty v. Burr Oak Lanes, Inc., 5 Ill2d 153, 125 NE2d 47 .’” ( 48 Ill.App.2d 81, 89 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.