38 Ill. App. 3d 1012 - McCoy v. Stackler’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fergus v. Marks · 14 Ill. App. 3d 1092 - Struve v. Department of Conservation · 40 Ill. App. 2d 308 - People Ex Rel. Thomas v. Board of Education · 32 Ill. 2d 539 - People Ex Rel. Scott v. Kerner · 25 Ill. App. 3d 224 - People Ex Rel. MacIuba v. Cheston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In view of the foregoing and the clear statutory prohibition against suits at law or in equity against the State, including those that are nominally brought against an individually named State official, we will reach only the plaintiff's initial contention [that mandamus should issue]. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 127, par. 801; People ex rel. Maciuba v. Cheston (1975), 25 Ill. App.3d 224 , 323 N.E.2d 40 ; Struve v. Department of Conservation (1973), 14 Ill. App.3d 1092 , 303 N.E.2d 32 ." ( 38 Ill. App.3d 1012, 1014 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.