¶1delivered the opinion of the court:
¶2Defendant was indicted on February 26, 1975, for two counts of unlawful possession and two counts of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. The offenses allegedly occurred on May 20, 1974, and defendant was arrested on November 7, 1974. Defendant filed a motion alleging that the prearrest delay of approximately five months violated his constitutional right to due process of law. A hearing was held and the trial court dismissed the indictment. The State appeals.
¶3The same issue was comprehensively discussed in our recent opinion in People v. Lawson, 38 Ill. App. 3d 239, 347 N.E.2d 430; reference is therefor made to that opinion.
¶4At the hearing defendant testified that he had no memory of the date in question. Steven Marada and Louise Banks, Illinois Bureau of Investigation agents testified briefly about the ongoing undercover investigation the I.B.I. was conducting in central Illinois. The trial court found that an ongoing undercover investigation did not constitute a reasonable excuse for failure to immediately indict the defendant. The defendant testified that he could not recall the time in question. This was insufficient to establish actual, substantial prejudice. People v. Lawson, 38 Ill. App. 3d 239, 347 N.E.2d 430.
¶5 As we have stated in Lawson, an arrest or indictment may be delayed for a reasonable time. It is also apparent from the trial judge’s remarks that he was of the opinion that the reasons for the delay were not relevant to a determination as to whether or not the delay amounted to a denial of due process.
¶6For the foregoing reason the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
¶7Reversed and remanded.
¶8CRAVEN, J., concurs.