Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

38 Ind. 266

Neff v. Richardson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1871

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1871-11-15

<p>Practice.—Appeal.—Notice to Co-defendant.—-Where two of three defendants appeal to the Supreme Court without notice of their appeal to their co-defendant, the appeal will be dismissed on motion.</p>

Decided 1871-11-15

Buskirk, J.

¶1The appellee sued William H. Neff, Lyman Harrington, and John Neff. The defendants were all served with process. William H. Neff was defaulted. The other defendants appeared and answered in bar of the action. There was issue, trial, verdict for plaintiff, and judgment on verdict. Lyman Harrington and John Neff alone moved for a new trial, alone prayed an appeal, alone executed the appeal bond, and alone prosecute this appeal. There has been no notice served on William H. Neff of this appeal, as is imperatively required by section 551, of the code, 2 G. & H. 270.

¶2The appellee insists that the appeal shall be dismissed. *267We have no discretion. The statute is plain and positive. The appeal must be dismissed.

y. M. Butler, for appellants.T. Patterson, for appellee.

¶3The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.

/38/ind/266 · .json · Public domain