38 Kan. App. 2d 165 - State v. McCarley’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Sturm · State v. Schoonover · State v. Bryan · In Re Stover · State v. Hebert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To establish this charge [of reckless aggravated battery], each of the following claims must be proved: 1. That Mr. McCarley recklessly caused great bodily harm or disfigurement to Nicola ‘Nick’ Cosentino . . . (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McCarley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.