Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 KANAPP2D 757 - State v. Bordeaux

State v. Bordeaux’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty · Dickerson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Several nonexclusive factors may be considered when reviewing the totality of the circumstances surrounding a defendant's statements to determine admissibility, including: (1) when and where the interrogation occurred; (2) how long it lasted; (3) how many police officers were present; (4) what the officers and defendant said and did; (5) the presence of actual physical restraint of the defendant or things equivalent to actual restraint such as drawn weapons or a guard stationed at the door; (6) whether the defendant is being questioned as a suspect or a witness; (7) how the defendant got to the place of questioning, that is, whether he or she came completely on his or her own in response to a police request or was escorted by police officers; and (8) what happened after the interrogation—whether the defendant left freely, was detained, or was arrested.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “has a right to remain silent, that any statement he does make may be used as evidence against him, and that he has a right to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “subjected to restraints comparable to those associated with a formal arrest,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.