Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 LAANN 491 - State v. Bates

State v. Bates’s Empirical Analysis

1886

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1926
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1926

6 state decisions

4018861890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not alleged that the judge’s charge was incorrect or was not clearly expressed. The attempt is made to support the ground [thus set up, for a new trial] by the affidavit of one of the jurors; but he cannot be permitted to impeach the verdict,” (Italics ours.) ,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.