Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 LAANN 736 - Dickson v. Ford

Dickson v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis

1886

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 1975
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 1975 · most notably Loranger v. Citizens' Nat. Bank (1927), Brewer v. New Orleans Land Co. (1923)

1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

501886189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Palangue v. Guesnon · Broussard v. Sudrique · Berards' Heirs v. Berard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The reason or the philosophy of the rule which, as an exception, flows logically from the very terms of the general rule, is that parol evidence, in such cases, is admitted, not against or beyond what is contained in the acts, as a contradiction of the clear recital, or legal meaning of the stipulations contained therein,' but on the contrary, to give effect to the contract arising therefrom, by supplementing necessary information omitted therefrom, or to ascertain the true intent of the parties when the same is not clearly expressed or described therein. “As thus understood and construed, the rule is not amenable to the charge that it tends to destroy or impair the sanctity or binding force of authentic acts, but on the contrary, it tends directly to enhance the validity ánd efficacy of such acts, by substituting light for darkness, certainty for obscurity, and truth for error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.