Commonwealth v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2024
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1783
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Barber v. Page · Mancusi v. Stubbs · Commonwealth v. Saferian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen a witness is outside of the borders of the United States and declines to honor a request to appear as a witness . . . because a [s]tate of the United States has no authority to compel a resident of a foreign country to attend a trial here”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Showalter · State v. Keys
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.