¶1The defendant was convicted by a jury of uttering and publishing a forged instrument, MCLA 750.249; MSA 28.446, and he appeals.
¶2An examination of the record and briefs discloses no prejudicial error.
¶3Affirmed.
38 Mich. App. 286
Decided February 21, 1972
Michigan Court of Appeals · decided 1972-02-21
Applies MI 750 § 750.249
Decided 1972-02-21
¶1The defendant was convicted by a jury of uttering and publishing a forged instrument, MCLA 750.249; MSA 28.446, and he appeals.
¶2An examination of the record and briefs discloses no prejudicial error.
¶3Affirmed.